The best logistics software for manufacturers with high freight costs
Oracle Transportation Management wins for freight spread across several modes; SAP and Blue Yonder each fit a different manufacturer better.
Oracle's data sheet for Oracle Transportation Management says the product manages all rates centrally, "including support for truckload, intermodal, less-than-truckload, parcel, air, rail and ocean," and its freight payment data sheet applies a tolerance audit to carrier bills across "all modes and all geographies" before a bill goes to accounts payable. That pairing is why we crown Oracle Transportation Management for a manufacturer with high freight costs: a company whose freight bill is split across several modes gets one documented rate store and one prepayment audit for all of them. The recommendation is strongest where the ERP is Oracle E-Business Suite or Oracle Cloud SCM, the Oracle applications the first data sheet documents integrations for.
SAP Transportation Management suits a manufacturer that already runs SAP ERP or S/4HANA and will bring its carriers onto SAP Business Network Freight Collaboration, because SAP's own training material places carrier invoice verification inside the ERP. Blue Yonder suits one whose freight is still planned by phone and spreadsheet across a large carrier base, and its certified adapter for SAP S/4HANA keeps that route open to SAP shops.
What a manufacturer with high freight costs should weigh
SAP's stories about Bondalti and Celsa UK and Blue Yonder's story about Mitr Phol Sugar each give a savings percentage without the spend it was measured against, on scopes that differ from one customer to the next. Percentages on those terms do not rank the vendors for another company's freight. ShipperGuide's guide to buying a transportation management system, or TMS, advises running every finalist's demo on your own freight data and asking for prices on the same scope, which gives you a figure for your lanes.
Gartner's definition of a TMS lists shipment consolidation and mode selection among the mandatory planning features. Those features act on the freight the system plans and rates. The Descartes TMS buyers guide tells shippers to record current shipping volumes by mode before writing requirements, and that record is what you hold against each vendor's named modes and the workflow it proposes for each one.
Freight audit, in the Descartes guide, means verifying carrier invoices against rates and contracts so an overcharge is found before payment. Gartner lists settlement that matches expected charges against actual charges as a mandatory TMS feature. Where the check runs, in the TMS or in the ERP, decides which system holds the dispute, so ask each vendor which team works the exceptions.
The same Descartes guide recommends evaluating how a TMS integrates with a real-time visibility platform and how carriers send status, through EDI and APIs. Shipment status in a TMS comes from carriers and tracking providers, so the feeds a vendor names tell you what a planner will see for your carrier base.
ShipperGuide puts required integrations at the start of a TMS selection, with IT reviewing them. The Descartes guide adds the back-end systems that support transportation to the list a shipper maps before writing requirements. For a manufacturer whose orders and carrier payments run through an ERP, that means asking each vendor to scope the order and invoice exchange with the ERP in place.
Oracle, SAP and Blue Yonder side by side
| Oracle Transportation Management | SAP Transportation Management | Blue Yonder Transportation Management | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modes the vendor documentation names | Central rates for truckload, intermodal, less-than-truckload, parcel, air, rail and ocean, in the product data sheet | Shipping types LTL, FTL, LCL, FCL and courier express parcel, in the SAP Learning overview lesson | Parcel, LTL, truckload, rail and ocean, with air through common carriers and 3PLs, on the Transportation Execution page |
| How a carrier bill is checked | Matched to bill-of-lading details and audited against percentage or amount tolerances the shipper sets, for "all modes and all geographies"; bills within tolerance go to accounts payable, per the freight payment data sheet | Verified in SAP MM; tolerance levels set as amounts or percentages; a discrepancy above tolerance raises a dispute, per the SAP Learning invoice lesson | Compared with the contracted rate and overcharges flagged; fuel surcharges, detention fees and stop-off charges named, in the Transportation Manager FAQ |
| Tracking sources named | Status updates from transportation service providers by web, XML, phone or tablet; automated milestone monitoring; arrival predictions that take in GPS updates | Milestones such as proof of pickup and proof of delivery in Freight Collaboration; mode-specific and regional visibility data providers through Global Track and Trace | Telematics, EDI and tracking-provider integrations; project44 and FourKites named as visibility partners |
| ERP integration documented | Sales order and shipment data synchronized with Oracle E-Business Suite; sample integrations with Oracle Cloud SCM through Oracle Integration Cloud | Bondalti integrated with SAP ERP; Celsa UK runs transportation management in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition | Certified two-way adapter for SAP S/4HANA, on-premise and private cloud |
| Named manufacturer and what the vendor reports | Klabin, pulp, paper and packaging: 200,000 shipments a year by truck, container, rail and air, moved off manual tools and spreadsheets | Bondalti, chemicals: 4% average reduction in transportation costs from a program of Transportation Management, Yard Logistics and Freight Collaboration. Celsa UK, steel: 1% to 2% savings on transport costs, 95% of road carriers on the network. Eight months for each project | Mitr Phol Sugar and its logistics company Fast and Fair, over 50 carrier partners: 5% of annual logistics spend saved after manual processes; on-time delivery from 80% to 90% |
Oracle Transportation Management: central rates across modes and a bill audit before payment
Planning in Oracle Transportation Management runs, in the words of its data sheet, "from simple, direct shipments to those involving multiple legs and multiple modes." The rates for those modes are managed centrally, so the rail leg and the truckload leg of one shipment are priced from the same rate store.
Freight bills are matched automatically against bill-of-lading details, according to Oracle's Freight Payment, Billing and Claims data sheet, and audited against percentage or amount tolerances the shipper defines. Bills within tolerance are approved and passed to what the sheet calls "any Accounts Payables system," and bills that fail show up in discrepancy reporting. The same sheet covers rate contracts, discounts and accessorial charges, and it supports auditing in-house or through a third-party audit firm.
Klabin, a Brazilian pulp, paper and packaging producer, moved to the product from manual tools and spreadsheets. Oracle's customer page puts its volume at 200,000 shipments a year "involving trucks, containers, rail, and air operations." The page reports lower direct and logistical costs and gives no percentage.
For tracking, the data sheet describes automated milestone monitoring and status updates that transportation service providers send by web, XML, phone or tablet. Oracle's product page adds arrival predictions that take in GPS updates and disruptions. On the ERP side, the data sheet documents synchronized sales order and shipment data with Oracle E-Business Suite and sample integrations with Oracle Cloud SCM through Oracle Integration Cloud. The integrations that sheet names are with Oracle's own applications, so a manufacturer running SAP ERP should ask Oracle to scope the order and invoice exchange with SAP during selection.
SAP Transportation Management: freight checked inside the ERP that holds the orders
Bondalti, a chemicals company in Portugal, contacted carriers by email and phone and worked from Excel spreadsheets before its SAP project. SAP's story reports a 4% average reduction in transportation costs from a program that combined SAP Transportation Management, SAP Yard Logistics and Freight Collaboration, integrated with the company's SAP ERP.
Celsa UK, a steel producer in Cardiff, runs transportation management inside SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition. SAP reports savings of 1% to 2% on transport costs there, with 95% of its road carriers collaborating through the network and one consolidated digital document replacing numerous invoices. Each project took eight months. Both stories describe road freight, and Celsa UK is considering an extension to rail.
SAP Learning's lesson on verifying carrier invoices places invoice verification in SAP MM, inside the ERP. Tolerance levels are configured as amounts or percentages, and a discrepancy above them raises a dispute that can end with a credit memo and a corrected invoice from the carrier. A manufacturer on SAP keeps the freight settlement document and the invoice check in the system that holds its orders.
The overview lesson lists less-than-truckload and full truckload, less-than-container and full container load, and courier express parcel as shipping types. SAP's Freight Collaboration page describes a "global, multimodal carrier and service provider network" with milestones such as proof of pickup and proof of delivery, and Global Track and Trace connects with mode-specific and regional visibility data providers. Celsa UK brought its carriers onto the network in waves.
Blue Yonder Transportation Management: a planning suite for freight still run by phone and spreadsheet
Mitr Phol Sugar's logistics company, Fast and Fair, ran on manual processes, phone calls, spreadsheets and paperwork across more than 50 carrier partners. Blue Yonder's customer story reports 5% of annual logistics spend saved and on-time delivery up from 80% to 90%. The percentage is a share of logistics spend, which the page does not break down into freight charges.
Blue Yonder's FAQ on the suite describes a cloud product that combines Transportation Planner and Transportation Manager with Carrier Network Collaboration and a Logistics Ops Agent. Its Carrier/LSP Network page lists carrier dashboards and proof-of-delivery tools for the carriers on the other end of each load.
The Transportation Execution page lists parcel, LTL, truckload, rail and ocean for inbound and outbound freight, air through common carriers and 3PLs, and private and dedicated fleets. Shipment updates arrive from telematics, EDI and tracking-provider integrations, and the Transportation Manager FAQ names project44 and FourKites as visibility partners.
That FAQ also says Transportation Manager compares a carrier invoice with the contracted rate automatically and flags an overcharge, with fuel surcharges and detention fees among the accessorials it names. For ERP fit, Blue Yonder describes its SAP S/4HANA adapter as a certified, pre-built integration with two-way data synchronization for on-premise and private-cloud S/4HANA.
Which logistics software is best for a manufacturer with high freight costs?
We crown Oracle Transportation Management for what its data sheets put on the record when freight spend is split across modes. All three vendors document a check on carrier bills. Oracle's rate sentence puts intermodal, rail, ocean, air, parcel and both truck modes under central rate management, and its billing sheet states that the tolerance audit applies to every mode and geography before a bill reaches accounts payable. A manufacturer shipping by truck and by rail or ocean can hold its lane list and its rate contracts against those two documents before signing anything, and one already on Oracle E-Business Suite or Oracle Cloud SCM has a documented order and shipment integration as well.
Oracle's current manufacturer story, Klabin, reports lower costs without a percentage, and SAP and Blue Yonder each publish one. We weigh the documented controls more, because none of those percentages comes with the spend behind it.
SAP is the better pick when your orders and supplier invoices already live in SAP ERP or S/4HANA and you are prepared to onboard your carriers to Freight Collaboration. Carrier invoices are verified and disputed in the ERP your finance team already works in, and the Bondalti and Celsa UK projects show that setup delivered inside a year. A buyer in that position who still wants Oracle on the shortlist should have the SAP order and invoice exchange scoped before comparing the two.
Choose Blue Yonder when freight is still planned by phone and spreadsheet and the carrier base runs to dozens of partners, the starting point Mitr Phol describes. Its suite pairs planning with a carrier network and names the tracking providers it takes status from. The certified S/4HANA adapter lets a manufacturer on SAP add it and keep the ERP.
Other logistics software providers
| Provider | Website |
|---|---|
| Manhattan Associates | manh.com |
| e2open | e2open.com |
| Descartes | descartes.com |
| Infios | infios.com |
| Uber Freight | uberfreight.com |
| Alpega | alpegagroup.com |
| C.H. Robinson | chrobinson.com |
| Shipwell | shipwell.com |
| Trimble Transportation | transportation.trimble.com |
| project44 | project44.com |
| FourKites | fourkites.ai |